Comments on: Net Neutrality - The “Build Out” Argument http://www.bradfox.com/blog/2009/06/net-neutrality-the-build-out-argument/ Thoughts on feature film, new media, and living in the digital wild west. Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:11:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: phvwackbmidd http://www.bradfox.com/blog/2009/06/net-neutrality-the-build-out-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-679 phvwackbmidd Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:55:06 +0000 http://www.bradfox.com/blog/?p=802#comment-679 qbyimwdcifly qbyimwdcifly

]]> By: Словарь Юриста http://www.bradfox.com/blog/2009/06/net-neutrality-the-build-out-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-561 Словарь Юриста Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:20 +0000 http://www.bradfox.com/blog/?p=802#comment-561 списки кандидатов, выдвигаемые партиями политическими и избирательными объединениями (блоками) на выборах в представительные органы, проводимые по пропорциональной избирательной системе. списки кандидатов, выдвигаемые партиями политическими и избирательными объединениями (блоками) на выборах в представительные органы, проводимые по пропорциональной избирательной системе.

]]> By: Five Arguments in Favour of Throttling - And Why They’re Wrong | BlogFox http://www.bradfox.com/blog/2009/06/net-neutrality-the-build-out-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-515 Five Arguments in Favour of Throttling - And Why They’re Wrong | BlogFox Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:06:09 +0000 http://www.bradfox.com/blog/?p=802#comment-515 [...] think hold much water: 1. Increasing capacity is prohibitively expensive. Regardless of my prior post on why building additional capacity is likely far more fiscally responsible than throttling [...] [...] think hold much water: 1. Increasing capacity is prohibitively expensive. Regardless of my prior post on why building additional capacity is likely far more fiscally responsible than throttling [...]

]]> By: | BlogFox http://www.bradfox.com/blog/2009/06/net-neutrality-the-build-out-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-514 | BlogFox Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:25:03 +0000 http://www.bradfox.com/blog/?p=802#comment-514 [...] Increasing capacity is prohibitively expensive. Regardless of my prior dissertation on why building additional consumption is likely far more fiscally responsible than throttling [...] [...] Increasing capacity is prohibitively expensive. Regardless of my prior dissertation on why building additional consumption is likely far more fiscally responsible than throttling [...]

]]> By: Brad http://www.bradfox.com/blog/2009/06/net-neutrality-the-build-out-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-493 Brad Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:16:44 +0000 http://www.bradfox.com/blog/?p=802#comment-493 It's a good question R, and one I don't have a really clear answer to. Part of it, I would suppose, is certainly that so much of the "volume" of the debate comes from US coverage, and the positions south of the border just seem to be much more polarized than the rest of the world (likely because established lobbies in the US are so much bigger, more capitalized, and have far more to lose). But even parties who should be better informed (as they're clearly covering the debates up front) continually seem to be shocked when an organization like the CFTPA comes out and says something like "P2P may be hurting us in piracy - but what we stand to lose in a loss of net neutrality is <em>far</em> more serious". Heck the CFTPA filing went into detail about how BitTorrent has been legitimately used to distribute independant content (including one of my shows) in this country (something the MPAA still alludes never has happened). It’s a good question R, and one I don’t have a really clear answer to. Part of it, I would suppose, is certainly that so much of the “volume” of the debate comes from US coverage, and the positions south of the border just seem to be much more polarized than the rest of the world (likely because established lobbies in the US are so much bigger, more capitalized, and have far more to lose).

But even parties who should be better informed (as they’re clearly covering the debates up front) continually seem to be shocked when an organization like the CFTPA comes out and says something like “P2P may be hurting us in piracy - but what we stand to lose in a loss of net neutrality is far more serious”. Heck the CFTPA filing went into detail about how BitTorrent has been legitimately used to distribute independant content (including one of my shows) in this country (something the MPAA still alludes never has happened).

]]> By: pat donovan http://www.bradfox.com/blog/2009/06/net-neutrality-the-build-out-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-492 pat donovan Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:49:53 +0000 http://www.bradfox.com/blog/?p=802#comment-492 good points, both on assumtions... bell, et al can keep their acts clean, and growth will wipe out any psp effect. luckers with the people whose lives demend on control, thou. pat good points, both on assumtions…

bell, et al can keep their acts clean, and growth will wipe out any psp effect.

luckers with the people whose lives demend on control, thou.

pat

]]> By: R. http://www.bradfox.com/blog/2009/06/net-neutrality-the-build-out-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-491 R. Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:15:24 +0000 http://www.bradfox.com/blog/?p=802#comment-491 Yes. It's amazing how out of touch many net neutrality commentators are on actual CRTC regulatory proceedings. Every single one of the creators' groups -- ACTRA, CFTPA, DGC, WGC -- has come out strongly in favour of net neutrality. Yet the blogosophere is shocked shocked when it happens to notice a filing from one of these groups that says so. Why? Yes. It’s amazing how out of touch many net neutrality commentators are on actual CRTC regulatory proceedings. Every single one of the creators’ groups — ACTRA, CFTPA, DGC, WGC — has come out strongly in favour of net neutrality. Yet the blogosophere is shocked shocked when it happens to notice a filing from one of these groups that says so. Why?

]]>